Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias as per the ROBINS-I methodological tool (low risk of bias: +, high risk of bias: -, lack of clarity:?)

From: Impact of obesity on outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Confounding bias

Selection bias

Deviation from the intervention

Missing data

Measurement of outcomes

Selective reporting

Classification of the intervention

Overall risk of Bias

Prasad, Elkholey et al. (2023)

+

+

?

+

+

?

+

Moderate

Peetermans, Guler et al. (2023)

+

+

+

+

+

+

Moderate

Javidfar, Zaaqoq et al. (2023)

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Low

Lu, Ortoleva et al. (2022)

+

?

?

+

+

+

+

Moderate

Djordjevic, Ivanov et al. (2022)

+

+

+

+

+

+

Moderate

Balik, Svobodova et al. (2022)

+

+

+

+

+

?

+

Moderate

Powell, Haase et al. (2022)

+

+

+

+

+

+

Moderate

Mongero, Stammers et al. (2021)

+

+

?

?

+

?

+

Serious

Alvarez, O’Malley et al. (2021)

+

+

+

+

+

+

Moderate

Salna, Fried et al. (2021)

+

+

?

+

?

+

+

Moderate

Verkerk, Dzierba et al. (2020)

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Low

Merritt-Genore, Lyden et al. (2020)

+

?

+

?

+

+

+

Moderate

Lee, Moon et al. (2020)

+

+

+

+

+

+

Moderate

Galvagno, Pelekhaty et al. (2020)

+

+

?

?

+

?

+

Serious

Salna, Chicotka et al. (2018)

+

+

+

+

+

+

Moderate

Cho, Oh et al. (2018)

+

+

+

+

+

+

Moderate

Lazzeri, Bonizzoli et al. (2017)

+

+

?

?

+

?

+

Serious

Kon, Dahi et al. (2015)

+

+

+

+

+

+

Moderate