Study | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | Overall Confidnce |
|---|
Santa Cruz 2022 [20] | Y | N | N | P | Y | N | N | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Critically low |
Cheema 2023 [21] | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Moderate |
Li 2022 [22] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | High |
Huang 2022 [23] | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Moderate |
Kang 2022 [24] | Y | P | N | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Moderate |
Beran 2022 [25] | Y | N | N | N | N | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Critically low |
Lee 2022 [26] | Y | Y | Y | P | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Moderate |
Weatherald 2022 [27] | Y | P | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Low |
Wang 2023 [28] | Y | Y | Y | P | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Critically low |
Cao 2023 [29] | Y | P | N | P | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Low |
Peng 2023 [30] | Y | N | N | P | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y | Critically low |
- 1: Are the research questions and inclusion criteria of the systematic review based on PICO framework? 2: Was a protocol for the systematic review developed prior to conducting the study, and if so, are the details of any revisions reported? 3: Is there an explanation provided for the selection of the study design? 4: Was a comprehensive search strategy used? 5: Does the study selection process demonstrate repeatability? 6: Does the data extraction process demonstrate repeatability? 7: Is a list of excluded studies and the reasons for exclusion provided? 8: Is detailed basic information about the included studies described? 9: Is the method for assessing bias risk in the included studies reasonable? 10: Is funding information for the included studies reported in the systematic review? 11: If meta-analysis was conducted, were appropriate statistical methods used for synthesizing the results? 12: If meta-analysis was conducted, was the impact of individual study bias risk on the meta-analysis results evaluated? 13: Was consideration given to the bias risk of individual studies when interpreting and discussing the results of the systematic review? 14: Is there a satisfactory explanation and discussion of existing heterogeneity? 15: If quantitative synthesis was performed, was the possibility of publication bias adequately investigated and discussed? 16: Are potential sources of conflicts of interest reported, including current funding resources received for the systematic review?
- Y YES, P Partially Yes, N NO
