Table 4 Round 3 responses (n = 19)-importance and feasibility of recording items on the ACFDR
Item | Percentage of participants scoring the item ≤ 3 on the 9 point scale (“not important/not feasible”) (n, %) | Percentage of participants scoring the item 4–6 on the 9 point scale (“neutral”) (n, %) | Percentage of participants scoring the item ≥ 7 on the 9 point scale (“important/feasible”) (n, %) |
|---|---|---|---|
How important is capturing a frequency/compliance item with airway clearance techniques? | 1 | 3 | 15 |
5% | 16% | 79% | |
How important is capturing physical activity data on the ACFDR? | 0 | 2 | 17 |
0% | 11% | 89% | |
How important is capturing fitness data on the ACFDR? | 0 | 1 | 18 |
0% | 5% | 95% | |
How feasible would it be for your centre to gather annual physical activity data using wearable devices? | 5 | 7 | 7 |
26% | 37% | 37% | |
How feasible would it be for your centre to gather annual physical activity data using a self-report method? | 0 | 1 | 18 |
0% | 5% | 95% | |
How feasible would it be for your centre to gather fitness data using laboratory-based fitness tests? | 7 | 4 | 8 |
37% | 21% | 42% | |
How feasible would it be for your centre to gather fitness data using field-based fitness tests? | 1 | 4 | 14 |
5% | 21% | 74% |